so to sum up my first segment quickly
i narrow down my specimen searches based on characteristics and the physicality... now i need to report my findings to this day and share them with the world. or, to keep in this blog forever, i dont quite know.
but now to continue my report
lets start at the beginning...
last year i decided to do my testing on the so called "young-but-promising" specimen. he was one year younger than I, but was more mature (hence the "promising" part above). Although he matched the characteristics and fit the whole, nerd/geek/dweeb category, he seemed to have an abnormally high level of testosterone, and was not mixing well with the needs of my original chemical. so after a month of testing, i decided to pull the plug and allow it back into the field.
it wasnt until november of last year that i decided to start up my research again, so i took a sample from the so called "scrawny-dweeb-with-cool-features" specimen. he was one year older then i was, and in the beginning the sample was more hesitant towards my chemicals, but with ease became rather close. in fact, within a month the sample had become a more sticky substance and would latch on to my chemical, not allowing it to breathe. the teenage language would describe this as clingy, and unfortunately also had to let my sample and all my research go to waste.
the most recent waste of my time and research went to the so called "lovable-aggressive-perverted-geeky-athlete." of course this seems bizarre, but to explain the complexity of this specimens substance would bore the readers and would take up as much time as it did to me. other than the athlete part, he qualified for my testing with flying colours in the beginning, but unfortunately did not last. when mixed with my chemical, the substance turned pink and became a full substance. by then i had thought my research was complete, and these papers and past data were thrown into a nearby trash can for 6 months. unfortunately by the end of the 5th month, the substance became hard and the pink darkened into a red, blood like colour and the two substances began to divide. Month wise, this was mid-July. i had noticed this and completely went back to work, until suddenly the vial began to crack, and the sample was forcing my chemical out through the cracks. the aggressive quality in the sample took the front and grew to the point that it was damaging my own physical state. i was sent to the emergency room because of this very reason this summer. by the end of the sixth month, i had failed to resolve the issue and, heartbroken, the sample was thrown to waste.
i sat, hopeless, and depressed, a wondering if i could ever fix the cracked vial and my chemicals state. for a month i couldn't find strength to carry on with my research, and thought to take a break. but unknowingly a new specimen was in my reach, i just needed the strength of my friends to fix up my lab. and now i am back up and running tests.
and now to bring you up to date on my studies. i have found a new specimen, the so called "too-good-to-be-true". it has been a total of six days, and the sample has begun to take effect on the vial and my chemical, and has begun to repair the damages of the last sample. it is too soon to tell if the chemicals will remain in sync with one another but the slow and easy process that has taken effect looks promising.
this report has come to an end. i will record my findings when there is more to tell. so far i can say that i am surprisingly happy with the results but it is too early for me to get my hopes up.
little happy dance....
annnnnddddd
over
.lifes.looking.up.for.
.Death.of.Beauty.
No comments:
Post a Comment